General
1)
Tom Joad had just gotten out of a state
penitentiary after killing someone. He
meets up with his old preacher, Jim Casy, and they go to the old Joad
farm. Seeing it abandoned, they decide
to camp outside. Muley Graves, also a
old family friend, happens to meet them there.
He explains how the banks have kicked all the tenant farmers off the
farms and that the Joad family was at Uncle John’s house. They head over there in the morning and within
24 hours set off to California (where all the” jobs” went). Along the way, Grandma and Grandpa die, they
meet the Wilsons, and make it to a Hooverville.
After trying several different farms, the Joad family settles on a peach
camp. Joad finds Casy again, (He had
gotten separated) authorities catch up, kill Casy and wound Tom. Tom makes it back to the camp and leave for a
cotton farm. Tom has to stay in hiding and,
soon enough, rain begins to flood the farm.
The book ends as they seek shelter in a barn. They find a dad who is starving because he
was giving all his food to his kid. Tom’s
sister (who had a still born earlier that day) feeds the guy with her breast
milk. A relatively straight forward story
of following a family through the dust bowl years.
2)
Avoiding clichés like family, betrayal, and
religion, I believe the theme of this novel is wealth and criminality. I couldn’t pick one because both of those
points are big parts of the story.
Wealth because the whole story takes place with only $40. The family has to make it from Oklahoma to California
from this money and whatever cents they come across with work. Criminality because Tom is on parole, he was
supposed to stay in the state of Oklahoma but decides to follow his family to
California.
3)
Following the examples of themes of wealth and criminality:
·
“But where does it stop? Who can we shoot? I don’t aim to starve to death before I kill
the man that’s starving me.” (Chapter 5)
·
“The bank – the monster – has to have profits
all the time. It can’t wait. It’ll die.
No, takes go on. When the monster
stops growing, it dies.” (Chapter 5)
·
“What do you want us to do? We can’t take less share of the crop – we’re
half starved now.” (Chapter 5)
4) Symbolism and Imagery are used when describing the road throughout the whole
book. The whole book takes place on this
road to California. Juxtaposition is used create a sense of unity between different
parts of the novel. Dramatization is used every time somebody talks. It is also used through repeated sayings and
the such. Prose is also used in the novel.
It allows for the smoothness of the dialogue and to avoid overly dramatic sayings. Similes
are another device used. “In the morning
the dust hung like fog, and the sun was as red as ripe new blood” (pg. 6). Personification
was also used. “The fire leaped and
threw shadows on the house” (pg. 68).
Seeming as we are now getting into basic lit devices, here is Alliteration, “Curious children crowded
close” (pg. 49) and Parallelism, “…could
read and write, could work and figure” (Pg. 106). Last but not least, Epistrophe, “But if we go, where’ll we go? How’ll we go?” (pg. 46)
Characterization
1)
Both Tom and Ma Joad are developed with indirect
characterization. Both characters are
based on how others see them. Muley
Graves and Jim Casey are developed with direct characterization because a
straight up description by the author is given.
2)
The syntax diction doesn’t change when focused
on different characters. I feel like
this choice is a roundabout way of making us not get too attached to the
characters.
3)
The protagonist can be argued to be either Ma
Joad or Tom. I’m going to say Tom. I feel that he is static because he always
goes back to what he does best. The beginning
of the story begins with him getting out of a penitentiary for killing someone. In the last couple of chapters, he kills an
authority. It is like he didn’t change
at all. I feel that he is flat as well,
not much to him.
4) After
thinking about this for a while, I feel like I didn’t meet anyone, just heard a
story of a family. The characters didn’t
pop and I feel like a story is a story, whether it has good characters or not.
Short, sweet and to the point. Yay for brevity! Perhaps it could be longer, but beggars can't be choosers. +1 good noodle star for you.
ReplyDeleteGood job! It was short and sweet, but if anyone was looking for in depth analysis of the novel then you would have to edit yours. But good job! +1 good noodle star for you.
ReplyDelete